Friday, June 30, 2006

Bush :: War Criminal


Hamden Opened The Door!Anti Torture      War Criminal charges against the cabal that have abused Executive Powers in the White House are starting to surface just a day after the SCOTUS ruled in Hamden vs Rumsfeld.
  Many of us have considered Bush a War Criminal since the beginning of the war in Iraq, which had nothing to do with terrorism and all to do with geo-political motives to control the oil and to set operational bases to attack Iran from.



This ruling may also affect torture, the NSA Domestic Spying and other aspects of abuse of Presidential Powers that have been usurped by this criminal White House.   Time will tell.



The Georgetown University Law Center Blog has a panel discussion on these issues that is very informative.   Especially worth note is this excerpt :


On war crimes: Yesterday, one enterprising military commission defense attorneys sent a letter to the commission "judges." It said: dear judges, I'm supposed to file motions today. I request a stay because I don't want to violate Common Article 3 and participating in the commission might make me liable for war crimes.




From an editorial Op-ed in the LA Times comes ::

Rosa Brooks: Did Bush commit war crimes?


Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld could expose officials to prosecution.

June 30, 2006



But the real blockbuster in the Hamdan decision is the court's holding that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention applies to the conflict with Al Qaeda — a holding that makes high-ranking Bush administration officials potentially subject to prosecution under the federal War Crimes Act.


Common Article 3 forbids "cruel treatment and torture [and] outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment." The provision's language is sweeping enough to prohibit many of the interrogation techniques approved by the Bush administration. That's why the administration had argued that Common Article 3 did not apply to the war on terror, even though legal experts have long concluded that it was intended to provide minimum rights guarantees for all conflicts not otherwise covered by the Geneva Convention.



But here's where the rubber really hits the road. Under federal criminal law, anyone who "commits a war crime … shall be fined … or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death." And a war crime is defined as "any conduct … which constitutes a violation of Common Article 3 of the international conventions signed at Geneva." In other words, with the Hamdan decision, U.S. officials found to be responsible for subjecting war on terror detainees to torture, cruel treatment or other "outrages upon personal dignity" could face prison or even the death penalty.


Continue Reading This Article...

  - fc