Saturday, December 30, 2006

Save The Internet :: First Battle Won

Small but Significant...

ƒç During the process of trying to merge AT&T back with BellSouth there were several critical defining sections.   The biggest is actually defining Net Neutrality.   By their doing so it lets the cat out of the bag where people are saying that it can't be defined.


The bad news is they only agree with the stipulations laid out in the agreement for 24 months.   That is not much time to clairfy and legislate the issue of Net Neteurality.   We must stay on top of this and keep up pressure thru netroots activism like Save The Internet and contacts to your local lawmakers to let them know we are watching.


This is just a single major battle in a continuing war against the megacorps and maintaining our rights on the internet...


DAILY KOS
AT&T Buckles on Net Neutrality


By by mcjoan

December 29, 2006


While we didn't get everything we wanted in the last Congress with Net Neutrality, we managed to hold off some very bad legislation, and to have a major impact in the negotiation process of AT&T's buyout of BellSouth, which was approved by the FCC today.   While the larger buyout raises many valid concerns about media consolidation and conglomeration, the provisions on net neutrality agreed to by AT&T signal a significant win for the good guys. From Columbia law professor, Tim Wu:


Strikingly, AT&T commits to a basic set of Network Neutrality principles that establish a baseline of great importance. They do not create a pure "bit-discrimination rule," but this language is crafted as a practical implementation of neutrality. As the first working rule, it may serve as a model and an experiment for what follows, which is why it merits attention.


The letter of commitment from AT&T to the FCC did a pretty good job of doing just that, defining net neutrality:


AT&T/BellSouth also commits that it will maintain a neutral network and neutral routing in its wireline broadband Internet access service. This commitment shall be satisfied by AT&T/BellSouth's agreement not to provide or to sell to Internet content, application, or service providers, including those affiliated with AT&T/BellSouth, any service that privileges, degrades or prioritizes any packet transmitted over AT&T/BellSouth's wireline broadband Internet access service based on its source, ownership or destination.



Continue Reading This Article...⇒

Technorati Technorati Cosmos ( Blogs Who Link To This Article )



More Links To This Issue ::   MYDD  ·  Huffington Post  ·  TechDirt


Oh Yeah...   They Hung Saddam yesterday...   For War Crimes...   Are you paying attention Mr. Bush?



bookmarks ⇒
del.icio.us
digg
Reddit
yahoo
slashdot


Thursday, December 28, 2006

Ramsay Clark

(Ramsay Clark defending Saddam Hussein at his trial for crimes against humanity - cartoon lifted from Slate.com).

In the last couple of days I've gotten a lot of referrals for people looking for information about Ramsay Clark. I would guess that this is because of the posting of Saddam Hussein's letter on the internet. The letter, written in response to his death sentence, apparently refers to those who supported him, including Clark, who was on his defense team.

Clark is also noted for defending others accused of crimes against humanity and genocide - for example, he defended Elizaphan Ntakirutimana, a Seventh-Day Adventist minister who was convicted of involvement in the Rwandan genocide. A Feb. 20, 2003 New York Times article provides more information:
A Protestant clergyman and his son, a physician, were convicted yesterday of genocide and sentenced to prison by the United Nations tribunal dealing with the Rwandan killing frenzy of 1994, in which members of Hutu gangs killed an estimated 800,000 minority Tutsi and moderate Hutu over three months.

The Rev. Elizaphan Ntakirutimana, 78, the former head of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in western Rwanda, was sentenced to 10 years in prison for aiding and abetting genocide. His son, Dr. Gérard Ntakirutimana, 45, who worked at the church's hospital, received a total sentence of 25 years for the same charges and for shooting two people to death.

With the verdict, Mr. Ntakirutimana became the first clergyman to be convicted of genocide by an international tribunal....

The three judges, led by Eric Mose of Norway, found that the pastor and his son had led attackers to the Mugonero Adventist church and hospital complex in Kibuye, where hundreds of unarmed Tutsi families, including Adventist ministers and their relatives, had sought refuge from the violence. The judges found that father and son also joined and guided vehicle convoys carrying attackers to nearby towns.

The judges, who dismissed other charges against the two, said that during the attacks, the physician had shot one man at close range in the hospital courtyard and another who had taken refuge at a school. ''As a medical doctor, he took lives instead of saving them,'' Judge Mose said in the court's summary.

Ramsey Clark, the former United States attorney general, who was defense counsel for the elder Mr. Ntakirutimana, called the verdict ''a tragic miscarriage of justice.'' He said both men would appeal.

The clergyman's case first gained attention in March 2000, when he became the first person handed over by the United States to an international tribunal....

Mr. Ntakirutimana is not the first member of the clergy to be held on genocide charges. Church workers, including two Catholic priests, have been convicted by local courts in Rwanda. In Belgium, two Rwandan nuns received long prison sentences for crimes against humanity for collaborating with Hutu militias.

But this case became known above all because of the astonishing letter that six Tutsi pastors wrote to him while they were at the church compound caring for refugees. The letter begged him for help, saying, ''We wish to inform you that we have heard that tomorrow we will be killed with our families.'' The group was indeed killed. During the trial, the letter was used as a prosecution exhibit. A witness, the son of one of the six clergymen, said the letter had received a cold reply saying nothing could be done.

While those accused of crimes against humanity and genocide also deserve competent legal counsel, Clark's wholehearted partisanship for those accused of such crimes is a revolting spectacle.

A statement issued by his office on November 29, 1996 on the International Tribune for Rwanda explains something of his enthusiasm for these cases:
Excerpts From A Statement On The International Tribunal For Rwanda

The International Tribunal for Rwanda is an extension of colonial power in Africa, which can threaten every African leader. There was never such a court during the colonial wars in Africa which could punish European powers for atrocities against the African people, or against apartheid leadership in South Africa; or the U.S. for its aggressions in Vietnam, Cambodia, Grenada, Libya, Panama, or Iraq, or the U.S.S.R., or Russian Federation in Afghanistan, Chechnya, East Europe, or the Baltic states.

The Tribunal is foreign power intervention taking sides to maintain its control over the majority Hutu through Tutsi surrogates. No country should surrender an accused to such a Tribunal until it is a permanent court that will deal equally and fairly in all cases worldwide against the powerful not only the weak, and act on truth alone, not political interest. The International Herald Tribune on November 23-24 reported on the slaughter of 298 Hutus in a Seventh Day Adventist Church after their return from the exile abroad. This Tribunal cannot protect these Hutus, or tens of thousands of others. Do the rich and powerful countries really believe they can do justice, or help Africa by prosecuting a select few while arming all sides to kill Africans and millions of Africans face starvation? It is their earlier interventions that have created these conditions.

Ramsey Clark, November 29, 1996

In response to these sentiments, Ken Harrow of Amnesty International wrote:
What an irony that Ramsey Clark would evoke the weak and the helpless in his defense of a man accused of genocide, would turn the blame outside Africa to absolve one who might well have assumed the guilt for the worst of crimes. Africa does not need any more defenders whose defense functions to deny Africa agency, responsibility for actions committed by Africans. It does not need Westerners to tell it that the powerful West is only and always responsible for crimes committed in Africa. The really weak and helpless victim here is justice, and the International Court is the first modest attempt to extend the concept of justice beyond national borders. Considering the crimes of our century committed by xenophobic nationalists, and the continuing crimes committed in the name of national interest, it is time for enlightened people to throw their support to international institutions based on premises of equity. ken harrow

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

Snow in Jerusalem


Once again, it is snowing in Jerusalem - and for once, I think that it is snowing more heavily there than here in Ithaca, where we now have a desultory lake-effect snowfall right now. (We've gotten hardly any snow this year thus far).

For links to more photos of today's snow in Jerusalem, see Elms in the Yard, a Jerusalem blog.

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Bush Lawyering Up

Flood of subpoenas cumin'...

č A desperate little cowboy in the White House jumpin' up and down hollerin' and screamin' about them crazy libruls that want to hang him.


Should have thought about all that Mr. Bush when you started boning up on the executive orders, signing statements, secret prisons, legalizing torture, spying on Americans, tracking airline flight records of people without telling them, etc... etc... etc...


I thought the most scathing comment came at the last about the 'drive-by-victims'...   More like 'Victim Makers of the Middle Class'...



baltimoresun.com
Bush is bracing for new scrutiny


White House hiring lawyers in expectation of Democratic probes

By Julie Hirschfeld Davis

Originally published December 26, 2006


WASHINGTON // President Bush is bracing for what could be an onslaught of investigations by the new Democratic-led Congress by hiring lawyers to fill key White House posts and preparing to play defense on countless document requests and possible subpoenas.


"Like any White House that has to deal with a Congress run by the other party, this White House has to bulk up its staff to deal with the inevitable flood of subpoenas. They're also going to have to coordinate with lots of friends and supporters," said Mark Corallo, a former top Republican aide to the House committee that issued more than 1,000 subpoenas to the Clinton camp.


Corallo and Barbara Comstock, another Republican public-relations executive with broad experience in Hill investigations, are launching a crisis-communications firm to serve officials and corporations who, Corallo said, could end up as "drive-by victims" in a new round of probes.





del.icio.us
digg
Reddit
slashdot rss
Technorati

Sunday, December 24, 2006

Bush's Nightmare

Of His Own Making...
wire-taps

His Legacy

One

Nightmare

After

The

Next



With
No
End
In
Sight




del.icio.us
digg
Reddit
slashdot rss

Fear :: Bush's Answer

That's All He Ever Had...
Bush Fear

ƒçAll we have to fear is fear itself.   Well...   I think the little cowboy has pretty well sewn up the competition when it comes to marketing fear.   As the caption at itsez where this graphic comes from says, "When the poll numbers are down, just stir up some more fear."


Well, the snake-oil salesmen in D.C. are giving it one more 'surge'.   They want to stir up the 'fear' that if we don't send several thousand more troops to Iraq, then we will lose the war.   Hello...   The war was lost several years ago.   The voters mandated change and we get none until it is forced on Bush and Cheney.   They will not give up their NeoCon Dreams so easily.   They will do nothing but stall and spin.


They still want to push the button on Iran and if we are not careful and very timely with our forcing issues in January, we will have an even bigger mess than we do now.   Full tilt Bozo, all ahead full...   Desperate criminals will do crazy shit.   Let's not forget that over the next few weeks.


The last throes of this pitiful little man's attempt to save his legacy may not be a pretty thing to see..





del.icio.us
digg
Reddit
slashdot rss
Technorati

Friday, December 22, 2006

TSA :: Secure Flight

Admitted They Broke The Law...

Orwell would be proud of Big Brother Bush.   The WaPo article is just the tip of the iceberg.   Memeorandum linked thru to Discourse.net who puts us in touch with The Practical Nomad (Ed Hasbrouck) who has extensive research and links to this very important issue...   Must reading...   - fc



washingtonpost.com
Report Says TSA Violated Privacy Law


The finding marks the first time that the Homeland Security Department has acknowledged that the problem-plagued Secure Flight program has violated the law. It comes at a time when a separate program to screen international passengers is under attack for officials' failure to disclose until recently that they were creating passenger profiles that would be stored for 40 years.


Discourse.net
TSA Violated Privacy Law


Ed Hasbrouck has been talking about this issue for a long time.



And, the Post makes no mention of what appear to be the follow-on illegalities.

Google Search :: Secure Flight     •     Google Search :: TSA



bookmarksThese Icons will bookmark this post at the most popular Social Bookmark Sites   See Also the Sidebar Catagories for bookmarks and feeds...  
del.icio.us  
digg  
Reddit  
slashdot  
rss  
Technorati

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Bushisms

War Of Words...

Dubya has not only been losing the War in Iraq, he has been losing the War of Words for just about as long.   Along with his own brand of ineptitude for governance, his mauling of the English Language is legendary.   And they just keep rolling right off that slick-tounged devil...   like...   A New Way Forward --- off the same old cliff...









































A New Way ForwardWe're not winning. We're not losing.
Colin Powell :: "So if it’s grave and deteriorating and we're not winning, we are losing." and then he says, "We haven't lost."
Absolutely, We're WinningPlan For VictoryStay The Course
Is our children learning?Mission AccomplishedBring It On
I'm the decider, and I decide what is best. And what's best is for Don Rumsfeld to remain as the Secretary of Defense." -- George W. Bush, Washington, D.C. April 18, 2006
"I like to tell people when the final history is written on Iraq, it will look like just a comma because there is -- my point is, there's a strong will for democracy." -- George W. Bush, interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Sept. 24, 2006
"You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror." -- George W. Bush, interview with CBS News' Katie Couric, Sept. 6, 2006
"Brownie, you're doing a heckuva job" - Mobile, Ala., Sept. 2, 2005
"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda," - Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we," Bush said. "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
"I will not withdraw, even if Laura and Barney are the only ones supporting me." -- George W. Bush
Trying to stop suiciders -- which we're doing a pretty good job of on occasion -- is difficult to do.
"So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him... We haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I - I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him." - March 13, 2002
"We are ready for any unforseen event which may or may not happen." - Nov. 18, 2002
Dubya :: "I'm gonna spend me some of this political capital"





bookmarksThese Icons will bookmark this post at the most popular Social Bookmark Sites   See Also the Sidebar Catagories for bookmarks and feeds...  
del.icio.us  
digg  
Reddit  
slashdot  
rss  
Technorati

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Religion Exhibit in Iran

Kamangir (an Iranian now living outside the country) has a link to a fascinating art exhibit in Tehran called "Godly religion." The image below, which he also reproduces, displays symbols of Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism.

Iran cartoons



David Horsey (of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer) has a wickedly good recent cartoon about the Iran Holocaust-denial conference.