Saturday, July 29, 2006

U.S. Hid Cost of Iraq Projects


More Incompetence!
File another Friday NewsDump under Bush Lies, Bush Incompetence, Bush Cronyism and failure to inform Congress.   Maha noted the other day that news of Bush Corruption hits the news on an almost daily schedule.   Stay the Course means lining the pockets of Bush's MegaCorps while projects in Iraq are stalled and sometimes simply not completed at all.



litbrit at Shakespeare's Sister has the heads up on the latest info released late on friday evening so that it gets little notice by the American Public.   A shamelessly repeated occurrence by the Bush Administration.


litbrit also runs down some info on the Bechtel Corp at The Center for Public Integrity which is mentioned in the audit report.   Very informative reading about one of Bush's favorite MegaCorps profiting from our tax dollars.   - fc
New York TimesAudit Finds U.S. Hid Cost of Iraq Projects


By JAMES GLANZ

Published: July 30, 2006


BAGHDAD, Iraq, July 29 - The State Department agency in charge of $1.4 billion in reconstruction money in Iraq used an accounting shell game to hide ballooning cost overruns on its projects there and knowingly withheld information on schedule delays from Congress, a federal audit released late Friday has found.



The agency hid construction overruns by listing them as overhead or administrative costs, according to the audit, written by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, an independent office that reports to Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department.



In March 2005, A.I.D. asked the Iraq Reconstruction and Management Office at the United States Embassy in Baghdad for permission to downsize some projects to ease widespread financing problems. In its request, it said that it had to "to absorb greatly increased construction costs" at the Basra hospital, and that it would make a modest shift of priorities and reduce "contractor overhead" on the project.



The hospital's construction budget was $50 million. By April of this year, Bechtel had told the aid agency that because of escalating costs for security and other problems, the project would actually cost $98 million to complete. But in an official report to Congress that month, the agency "was reporting the hospital project cost as $50 million," the inspector general wrote in his report.



The report said it suspected that other unreported costs on the hospital could drive the tab even higher. In another case cited in the report, a power station project in Musayyib, the direct construction cost cited by the development agency was $6.6 million, while the overhead cost was $27.6 million.



One result is that the project's overhead, a figure that normally runs to a maximum of 30 percent, was a stunning 418 percent.



Continues Reading...